When an author submits a manuscript to the Research Guru Journal for publication consideration, he or she agrees to abide by Research Guru E-Journal requirements. Specifically, an author must:
Research Guru E-Journal Publication Ethics
Agree that his or her manuscript presents work that is original, not plagiarized; that he or she has not submitted the manuscript under review for publication elsewhere; and that he or she will not submit the manuscript under review to another publication during the review period at the Research Guru E-Journal.
Agree that, during the review process, he or she will take down all other versions of submitted manuscripts (e.g., working papers, prior drafts, final drafts) posted on any Web site (e.g., personal, departmental, institutional, university, archival, working series).
Take full responsibility for the work he or she submits to and publishes with the Research Guru E-Journal.
Make the citations or referencing should be according to the sixth edition of the American Psychological Association (APA, 6th edition) or MLA 7th edition.
Submit the manuscript in a Microsoft Word file from which the author has removed the title page, his or her name, and all author-identifying references.
Submit the manuscript via e-mail to the firstname.lastname@example.org or online website submission.
Agree that his or her submission supports the core values of the Research Guru: Online Journal of Multidisciplinary Subjects (http://www.researchguru.net)
Research Guru: Online Journal of Multidisciplinary Subjects, editor-in-chief, Executive editor, Peer reviewers, and the members of the editorial board and advisory committees are not responsible for errors or any consequences arising from the use of information contained in the Journal.
Authors should read the “Instructions for Authors” Menu on the website’s page before making a submission. Manuscript should be prepared according to the style and specifications of the journal’s policy.
Reviewers should evaluate manuscript based on the scientific merit in an impartial and unbiased way.
Reviewers should particularly comment on Novelty and originality of the work.
Reviewers should evaluate the suitability of methodology described, study design etc.
The information related to the article under review should be kept confidential Any potential conflicts of interest should be communicated to the Editor.